|
|
| Volume
40 Number 3: >>
|
| |
|
Hospital
coding of Dementia: is it accurate?
Elizabeth Cummings, Roxanne Maher,
Christopher Morris Showel, Toby Croft, Jane Tolman, James Vickers,
Christine Stirling, Andrew Robinson & Paul Turner
p5
[ Full
Article ]
Abstract
This paper investigates the coding of dementia in the episode of
care in a pilot study group (N=48) post hospital discharge and the
possible implications of under-coding. The assigned ICD-10-AM codes
and Diagnosis Related Groups were reviewed. Results demonstrate
under-coding of dementia and of cognitive deficits; poor correlation
between admission diagnoses and dementia codes on separation; and
changes in individual patients’ cognitive status across forms and
assessments in the same admission. The complexities of accurately
coding dementias will impact upon planning for future treatments and
service provision and will have a flow-on effect for patients,
hospitals, and patient care in Australia.
|
 |
How
good is the New South Wales admitted patient data collection in
recording births?
mary K Lam p12 [
Full
Article ]
Abstract
This record linkage study aims to examine the coding concordance
of delivery outcome and discharge status between the New South Wales
(NSW) Midwives Data Collection (MDC) and Admitted Patients Data
Collection (APDC) as well as factors that contribute to hospital
births not being recorded in the APDC. Births recorded in the APDC
and MDC datasets for the calendar year 2005 were used for analysis.
Births registered in the NSW Registry of Births Deaths and Marriages
for the same period were used as validation. Descriptive analysis
was used to examine coding concordance between the APDC and MDC
datasets for matched records, and logistic regression analyses were
used to identify factors associated with hospital births not being
included in the APDC. A total of 90,585 unique births were recorded
in the MDC for the calendar year 2005. A total of 79,173 confirmed
hospital births were matched to corresponding records in the APDC;
2,249 (3%) confirmed hospital births were not found in the APDC. For
unmatched records, logistic regression analyses showed that the
level of obstetric hospital in which babies were born was a
significant factor associated with information not being recorded in
the APDC. As compared with local, small isolated, and small
metropolitan hospitals (Levels 1 to 3 hospitals), larger tertiary
hospitals (Levels 4 to 6) and private hospitals had decreased odds
of hospital births not being recorded in the APDC. For matched
records, 95% and 99% of records were found to be coded consistently
between the APDC and MDC datasets for outcome of delivery and
discharge status respectively. With a high level of coding
concordance between the APDC and MDC datasets and only a small
percentage of hospital births not being recorded in the APDC, the
obstetrics subset of the APDC dataset was found to be of good
quality.
|
 |
Dual
vs. single computer monitor in a Candian hospital Archiving
Department: a study of efficiency and satisfaction
Thomas G Poder, Sylvie T Godbout & Christian Bellmare
p20 [ Full
Article ]
Abstract
This paper describes a comparative study of clinical coding by
Archivists (also known as Clinical Coders in some other countries)
using single and dual computer monitors. In the present context,
processing a record corresponds to checking the available
information; searching for the missing physician information; and
finally, performing clinical coding. We collected data for each
Archivist during her use of the single monitor for 40 hours and
during her use of the dual monitor for 20 hours. During the
experimental periods, Archivists did not perform other related
duties, so we were able to measure the real-time processing of
records. To control for the type of records and their impact on the
process time required, we categorised the cases as major or minor,
based on whether acute care or day surgery was involved. Overall
results show that 1,234 records were processed using a single
monitor and 647 records using a dual monitor. The time required to
process a record was significantly higher (p= .071) with a single
monitor compared to a dual monitor (19.83 vs.18.73 minutes).
However, the percentage of major cases was significantly higher (p=
.000) in the single monitor group compared to the dual monitor group
(78% vs. 69%). As a consequence, we adjusted our results, which
reduced the difference in time required to process a record between
the two systems from 1.1 to 0.61 minutes. Thus, the net real-time
difference was only 37 seconds in favour of the dual monitor system.
Extrapolated over a 5-year period, this would represent a time
savings of 3.1% and generate a net cost savings of $7,729 CAD
(Canadian dollars) for each workstation that devoted 35 hours per
week to the processing of records. Finally, satisfaction
questionnaire responses indicated a high level of satisfaction and
support for the dual-monitor system. The implementation of a
dual-monitor system in a hospital archiving department is an
efficient option in the context of scarce human resources and has
the strong support of Archivists.
|
 |
Smart
use of data, information and communication; The INFORM-ed Best Local
Practice Project - Grafton Base Hospital
Sheree Lloyd, Jean Collie, Alastair McInnes, Kevin King, Alison
Lollback & Angie Garland p26 [
Full
Article ]
Summary
This paper describes current progress for an information
management project in a medium-sized rural hospital after the first
four months of the one-year project. In particular, the article
examines some of the project outcomes to date as these relate to the
National Hospitals and Health Reform recommendations for the smart
use of data, information and communication. The paper identifies a
number of important challenges and issues that have been addressed
by the project and proposes that the project findings may be used to
inform similar projects in other settings. These findings relate to
clinician requirements for reports, investment in human resources,
development, and time for information management activities. An
understanding of data collected, information systems, and
presentation of clinician data are also important. The benefits of
information sharing in assisting quality improvement activities are
particularly relevant but, more importantly, they can engage and
involve clinicians in the use of information. The importance of
local data, information, and knowledge is described. Finally, issues
for the health information management profession, such as working
collegially and sharing knowledge and expertise, are outlined.
.
|
 |
Who
owns the information in the medical record? Copyright issues
Judith Mair p31 [
Full
Article ]
Summary
As part of every private healthcare practice and healthcare
facility, documentation of patients’ healthcare, diagnoses and
treatment are an ongoing requirement with legal connotations. The
question that may arise is whether copyright can subsist in patient
medical records, and if so, what benefit may arise from ownership of
such copyright.
|
|
|