|
|
| Volume
37 Number 2: >>
Health
information, past and future |
| |
 |
The
Hospital Mortality Project: a tool for using administrative data for
continuous clinical quality assurance.
S Aqif Mukhtar, Neville E Hoffman, Gerry MacQuillan and James
B Semmens p9 [ pdf
]
Abstract
The increasing demand
for greater clinical accountability requires development of
convenient tools to measure healthcare safety and quality, which are
able to provide information contemporaneously. The purpose of this
paper is to describe the development of the Hospital Mortality
Project, a quality assurance initiative designed to encourage and
facilitate clinical accountability for hospital mortality by all
clinical departments and clinicians. T he project was carried out in
two stages. Part 1: After registration of in-hospital patient deaths
(1 May 2004 to 31 December 2007), the consultant in charge of
patient care was notified and requested to assign the death to a
predefined category. This categorisation leads to further
investigation as appropriate. Part 2: Hospital administrative data
from 1 April 1997 to 31 December 2007 were used to assess a defined
index, the Hospital Mortality Index (HMI), which was the expressed
in the form of an Attribute Control Chart (p-CHART ) and then used
as a performance indicator for hospital departments and clinicians.
Summary data are reported to the clinical departments and to the
hospital executive via the Quality Improvement Committee on
quarterly basis. The clinical review was complete for 2,990 of 3,132
(95%) inpatient deaths till 31 December 2007, while a further 142
(5%) deaths are still in the process of being reviewed as of 7 April
2008. The median age of all the cases was 78 years (IQR 67-86) of
which 1,657 (53%) were male. The Poisson regression analysis showed
that since 1997 departments with a minimum of 100 deaths in total
showed no clinically significant change in HMI over time. The
Hospital Mortality Project provides a simple and efficient tool to
analyse data for clinical managers to facilitate accountability.
|
 |
An
evaluation of the quality of obstetric morbidity coding using an
objective assessment tool, the Performance Indicators for Coding
Quality (PICQ).
Mary K Lam, Kerry Innes, Patricia Saad, Julie Rust, Vera
Dimitropoulos and Megan Cumerlato p19 [ pdf
]
Abstract
The Performance Indicators for Coding Quality (PICQ) is a data
quality assessment tool developed by Australia’s National Centre
for Classification in Health (NCCH). PICQ consists of a number of
indicators covering all ICD-10-AM disease chapters, some procedure
chapters from the Australian Classification of Health Intervention (ACHI)
and some Australian Coding Standards (ACS). The indicators can be
used to assess the coding quality of hospital morbidity data by
monitoring compliance of coding conventions and ACS; this enables
the identification of particular records that may be incorrectly
coded, thus providing a measure of data quality. There are 31
obstetric indicators available for the ICD-10-AM Fourth Edition.
Twenty of these 31 indicators were classified as Fatal, nine as
Warning and two Relative. These indicators were used to examine
coding quality of obstetric records in the 2004-2005 financial year
Australian national hospital morbidity dataset. Records with
obstetric disease or procedure codes listed anywhere in the code
string were extracted and exported from the SPSS source file. Data
were then imported into a Microsoft Access database table as per
PICQ instructions, and run against all Fatal and Warning and
Relative (N=31) obstetric PICQ 2006 Fourth Edition Indicators v.5
for the ICD-10- AM Fourth Edition. There were 689,905 gynaecological
and obstetric records in the 2004-2005 financial year, of which
1.14% were found to have triggered Fatal degree errors, 3.78%
Warning degree errors and 8.35% Relative degree errors. The types of
errors include completeness, redundancy, specificity and sequencing
problems. It was found that PICQ is a useful initial screening tool
for the assessment of ICD-10-AM/ACHI coding quality. The overall
quality of codes assigned to obstetric records in the 2004- 2005
Australian national morbidity dataset is of fair quality.
|
 |
Professional
practice and innovation:
Identifying and flagging children and young people under state
guardianship on the Patient Administration System (PAS). Tanya
Drake and Belinda Sydes p30 [ pdf
]
Abstract
In December 2006 a data matching trial was undertaken in
partnership between Women’s and Children’s Hospital (WCH) and
Families South
Australia (SA), the state child welfare agency, to identify children
and young people under guardianship of the Minister for Families and
Communities with those already registered on the WCH Patient
Administration System (PAS). By identifying this group of children,
a priority health response could be initiated to improve their
health and wellbeing. The data supplied by Families SA identified
1,683 children currently under guardianship. Data were compared
against the WCH PAS, which identified that 72% (n = 1,212) of these
matched with patients who were already registered on the PAS. There
were 28% (n = 471) that did not match; these individuals were
registered on the PAS so that if they did present to the hospital
the appropriate measures could be taken to ensure they received the
necessary treatment and follow-up.
|
|
|
|
|